The Enquirer has written a piece about Todd Palin and a possible affair with a masseuse, who just happens to be a prostitute. Sometimes the Enquirer gets it right, sometimes it doesn't. They were right about John Edwards.
Is the story about Todd Palin backed up with facts? We don't know yet. If the story is true, I suspect that Sarah Palin will not be running for President in 2012. This family has too much baggage to take to the White House. Sarah espouses chrisitan family values, yet her son was addicted to drugs, and was involved in a local vandalism incident; Bristol had unprotected sex, in their home, and became pregnant out of wedlock (some believe for the 2nd time); Sarah herself has been suspected of an affair with her husband's former business partner, and now the Enquirer story of a possible affair between Todd and a prostitute.
All over the internet there is speculation that Sarah Palin faked her pregnancy with Trig in an attempt to cover up another pregnancy of Bristol. What is curious to me, is that Mrs. Palin, rather than straight up stating that Trig is indeed her child, and not Bristols' stated "Bristol is five months along, it would be impossible for her to be Trig's mother." What?? She could have spared her daughter this embarrassment had she just been more forth coming with her statement. There is immense suspicion concerning Trig's birth.
In keeping with Sarah's christian family values, the Bible states: Ephesians 5:3 "But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God's holy people."